good story needs a beginning, a middle and an end… but not necessarily in
The news this week of the assassination of a beloved leader in a volatile region has forced many of us to brush up on our knowledge of the history of Pakistan. The story of a leader exiled, and, then returning, at great risk; the concept of a “Ku…” by a general who still sits in power; the notion of killing the former when she is no longer in power – all of this should not be new to us, and indeed, when we touch up on our history of, LaHavdil, Moshe Rabeinu this week, we should be struck by the similarity present history shares with Midrashik record.
There is a glaring mystery regarding the missing years of Moshe’s life: the Torah informs us of Moshe’s running away at the tender age of 18 (some say 17, others 20) and, in that very same Pasuk, we are told of his settling in Midian. What, if anything, happened in-between? Did Moshe return to Egypt to save the Jews at such a young age? Surely, if he died at 120, and we know the Makkos only lasted for about one year and the sojourn in the wilderness was for 40 years, then, Moshe should have been close 80 upon his return!
The Yalkut Shimoni (# 168), in an unatributed entry brings the following Midrash:
There was a
land, Kush, whose king, Kokenus, was busy at war with the Bnei Kedem. Billam,
who had recently fled Egypt, was able to incite the populace to revolt
against the king while he fought at battle. Upon his return the king saw
that the walls had been fortified on all sides and that Billam had succeeded
in a Ku. As the king began to set up residence with his army just outside
the now fortified capitol, a young man, Moshe, arrives after escaping death
at the hands of Pharaoh. Moshe eventually succeeds in leading an invasion to
take back Kush and they made Moshe the new king (Kukenus had died 9 years
after Billam’s revolt). Unfortunately, after 40 years of loyal leadership,
Moshe was removed from his post and although many wanted him dead he was
spared. It was then that he arrived in Midian.
Now, if Moshe was
willing to lead Kush, if he was able to balance humility with an
acknowledgment of his talents, if he was able to successfully guide that
nation to tremendous victory, then, why would he be so disinclined, indeed
averse, when approached to lead the Jewish people?
It would seem that statements like, “…who am I…”(3:11) and “…I am not a man of words…” (4:10) are beyond disingenuous considering his past triumphs and accomplishments.
Yet G-d was able to dissuade him of his aversion by telling Moshe Rabbeinu about a journey to a land flowing with milk and honey as well as assuring him that the nation would believe in him. (Clearly, after the incident in Kush, Moshe had seen that a nation could initially believe and trust a leader and yet with time see it erode into the abyss.)
What was it that G-d said that had the ability to persuade and dissuade Moshe away from his negative response and transform him into the reluctant hero that he became? Why was this nation, Amcha Beis Yisroel, cause for deeper concern then the nation of Kush?
There was something unique about Moshe’s mission and leadership. Something, that when looking at history, we find he was the only one to have had the distinctive position of.
Every leader is a leader by default, a de facto charge over a people: one becomes a leader of a land mass, a country, and, by a “Kinyan Agav”, thereby acquires the responsibility for the people within said land as well. Clearly, then, it is the people, the land , that holds the power, for it shall always remain, leaders, conversely, are replaceable. Moshe, after 40 years of such leadership, understood that he did not have the political skills, the power to manipulate through words (“I am not a man of words”), to be able to maintain leadership – he would not dare put himself in a position of Chanipha and Yerida, having to sacrifice for a vote, ever again.
What G-d had informed Moshe was that he will be the
first and only leader to lead - not over a land rather a nation. Indeed, in
Moshe’s time, after the exodus, the Jews never had a land; they traveled
from place to place never resting in comfort. Moshe led a people, not a
country; a nation, not a geographical local.
Moshe was to be the only mainstay throughout all the Massoas, and indeed, when they did acquire the Land, the land of milk and honey, it was no longer within Moshe’s mission to lead them. This was the promise of G-d to Moshe: true leadership, over a people, a Law, a Torah, a philosophy, which shall transcend borders, tear down barriers and that knows no boundaries.
It was the leadership that we all would soon be charged with at Sinai: “…Uvalechtecha BaDerech…”. We were taught this Torah – a Law that has no perimeter to its jurisdiction, by a man who had no boundaries to his rulership.
This week, the number one book on the New York Times bestseller list is an autobiography written by a comedian. In one starred review the writer relates a passage in the book, where the author writes how on one night, when he was still a nobody, he was performing his act, and at the end of the show, instead of saying, “Thank you and good night”, he instead said, “come with me”. The audience followed him outside and they preceded to walk through the neighborhood while he had humorous back and forths with pedestrians and entertaining dialogue with the audience. It was at this moment, and through this part of his act –which became a mainstay and the strongest draw- that ascended him to stardom.
Our religion is not restricted to a Beis Haknesses or a Beis Medrash. It does not become more important when we are being watched or more serious when we will be caught. It is a teaching and a culture that knows no confinement.
As we were born as a nation, G-d, in His infinite wisdom saw to it that this message will be with us from the moment we leave Egypt until we arrive in our Land. Knowing that with a land can come the great risk of a sense of entitlement and the confidence in national power without steady national leadership, He, therefore, taught us how to follow and lead within the confines of brotherhood and text, not territorial control nor political expedience.
There is but one other leader who will be given such an inimitable role of un-bordered leadership.
However there is one difference: Moshiach, after he
leads and gathers from throughout the four corners of the earth, will indeed
be allowed entrance into Israel as well, and, for the first time, we will be
lead by our liberator from bondage in the Land of our Fathers.
May we see that Day soon.
 The Ramban who asks our questions, clearly did not have this Midrash, or perhaps did but did not feel it to be following simple Pshat, and had a different understanding of certain Pesukim in Divrei HaYamin.
may feel inclined to suggest that, on the contrary, it is perhaps easier
to understand then why Moshe was so reluctant to take the mantle
of leadership when asked by G-d. He was not just a simple, he was
not a shy Shepard, who, through inexperience and fragility, felt
unready for leadership, rather, he was a worn out leader, cynical
about the prospects of assuming a position of power.
 Indeed, as the Yalkut ad loc. relates, it was Moshe’s steadfastness in his morals that led to his downfall (he would not be intimate with the queen, the daughter of King Kukunas which caused her to spread lies about his character – interesting how Yoseph lost control under the exact same scenario, see Davarim Shavvim Chelek 2, Sefer Shmos, by this author).
 Born Standing Up
Yomi takes place nightly at the Young Israel of Greater Buffalo, 105 Maple Road,
after the evening services. For complete schedule call 634-0212 or visit their
web site at yibuffalo.org