The World Court

Commentary by Dr. Gerhard Falk


The International Court of Justice

This so-called court is a tool of the Arab and European Jew haters. That this is so is easily seen by its composition alone. Furthermore, its newest “ruling”, which amounts to an opinion that Jews ought to be murdered, leaves no doubt that this “court” is the direct successor of the “Freisler” court, so named after its chief judge, Freisler, who automatically sent to death anyone who came before him in Nazi Germany. All Jews, of course, and also anyone suspected of anti-Nazi sentiment (Freisler was killed by a bomb during the last days of “Walhalla”).

When in December of last year the International Court of (In)justice accepted the Arab case against Israel’s fence-wall to prevent murderers from entering Israel, the U.S. told that gang of haters that the security fence is a political issue and is not within its jurisdiction. Even a few European countries held that view, although all European governments denounced Israel, i.e. “the Jews”, for seeking to defend themselves against indiscriminate murder.

Of course the so-called court took the case anyway, since the whole purpose of that “court” is to persecute Jews, rail against the United States and cause as much suffering as possible.

The Arabs, who have an automatic majority in all United Nations votes, are now of course using this “international opinion” to demand the invasion of Israel by an international army in order to enforce their hate propelled intentions on the remnants of the Holocaust.

No doubt the Europeans are more than eager to help their Arab brethren in their murderous intentions. The Euro-Arab alliance believes sincerely that the slaughter of 6 million Jews was not enough and that now they ought to have the opportunity to finish the job and kill another 5.5 million Jews, who have no right to defend themselves.

Looking at the composition of the so-called International Court of Justice, it becomes evident at once that no justice can be expected for any Jew by Abdul Koroma of Sierra Leone, Awn Shawkat Al-Khasawneh of Jordan, Nabil Elaraby of Egypt, whose country televises the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, or Bruno Simma of Germany (Yemach shemo v’sikhrow- may his name be erased from memory), or Gilbert Guillame of France, the most anti-Jewish country in Europe now. China is represented by Shi Jiouyong. This Arab puppet delivered the 14-1 opinion. China is of course entirely dependent on Arab oil (The Chinese imports of Arab oil has driven our gas prices so high).

It is to the honor of the United States and the civilized world that Thomas Buergenthal, the only American judge, stood by Israel and rejected this murder inspired decision.

The “court” also demands that Israel pay compensation to the Palestinians for their losses. What the Palestinians lost because of the wall so far constructed by Israel is the opportunity to murder more Jews. During the past three years alone, the killers slaughtered 700 Israelis and maimed 2,400. Having now been deprived of the opportunity to commit further murder, the Arabs seek compensation for their loss. Their “loss” is failure to kill more Jews. Considering that their success rate has declined 90% since 25% of the fence was built, this means that the Palestinians are short 270 corpses and 1,800 maimed. Therefore, considering their great “loss”, the Jews owe the Arabs $1 million for each potential kill and $900,000 for each potential maiming.

The Arabs believe that if the Europeans have the right to slaughter 6 million Jews, then they too have the same right and the International Court of Justice agrees with them.

According to the Charter of the United Nations, the General Assembly can debate any issue but cannot take military action against any country. However, the so-called Security Council can order international sanctions from economic boycott to bombing and invasion. This was done on behalf of Moslem Albania in 1999 when, to our shame, then President Bill Clinton allowed this country to fight for Albania, a country which sent an entire SS Division to Germany to fight in Hitler’s war.

The Security Council is subject to a veto by the United States, Britain, France and Russia. Therefore it has already been announced by our State Department that the U.S. will veto any Security Council resolution designed to destroy Israel. This decision is of course the province of our President, George W. Bush.

Now let us take a look at the opinion of John Kerry, Democrat candidate for the presidency. Said John Kerry to the Arab-American Institute: “… Ramallah (an Arab town) Palestinian women, traveling on foot, were forced to stand in long lines at check points, with their children tugging at their sleeves and their arms loaded with groceries or other basic needs. The suffering and harassment of Palestinians has grown, etc. etc.”. This is true. Indeed, the Palestinians are greatly inconvenienced, Senator Kerry. It would seem to any fair minded person, however, that death or losing a limb or an eye is far worse than any inconvenience. Moreover, every Palestinian killed or wounded during the last 100 years was killed or wounded by the hatred and murderous actions of the Arabs themselves. No terror, no fence. No murder, no war.

Today, only President George W. Bush stands between the Euro-Arab Auschwitz alliance and the destruction of Israel. Remember that in November.

Shalom u’vracha.

Dr. Gerhard Falk is the author of numerous publications, including Man's Ascent to Reason (2003) & the forthcoming Football & American Identity.

Home ] Up ]